Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2025
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso, Paloma Batista
Orientador(a): Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko.
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Letras
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/23860
Resumo: Negation is a property common to all natural languages. Often understood as indicative of opposition, it encompasses syntactic-semantic and pragmatic processes. Through negation, speakers demonstrate commitment to something, perform subjective evaluations, or alter the propositional status of a sentence. Negation assumes assertive, modal, and propositional functions. Through it, speakers influence the actions of their listeners. In doing so, they perform speech acts that are not solely structured by grammatical items. Speech acts also involve manual gestures, highlighting the multimodal nature of language. Multimodal studies in English, French, and German (Kendon, 2004; Harrison, 2010; Bressem; Müller, 2014) argue that rejection, opposition, and negative evaluation are functions indicated by grammatical items and manual movements. From this perspective, negation operates in layers. In Brazilian Portuguese, studies on negation are traditionally conducted from two perspectives: variationist and/or informational. Não is the quintessential negation adverb. This lexical item can scope over nouns and verbs. When it scopes over verbs, it can appear in pre-verbal position (NEG1), in double position (NEG2), or in post-verbal position (NEG3). From a sociolinguistic perspective, the three possibilities of verbal negation constitute a variable phenomenon. In this framework, the use of one form or another is associated with grammatical and social factors. Conversely, from an informational perspective, the use of NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3 is constrained by the informational status of the negated content and provides clues about the communicative intentions between speaker and listener. Grammatical and informational factors are highly relevant to negation. However, by themselves, they are insufficient to explain the functions of this property. Interactions between speakers and listeners also involve the body, which "speaks" as well. In this thesis, we investigate whether manual gestures within the scope of the particle não constitute multimodal negation structures with distinct pragmatic functions. To this end, we analyzed negation data from 23 interviews in the Embodied Language 2023 sample. From these, we selected instances of NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3 performed simultaneously with manual gestures. Subsequently, we coded the grammatical, informational, and gestural aspects of the negation structures according to the methodology proposed in the Linguistic Annotation System (Bressem; Ladewig, 2011), enabling the analysis of their functions through association tests. We conclude that negation is a speech act that operates in three dimensions. Grammatical factors associated with its function include the semanticpragmatic feature of the verb within the scope of não, the type of verb, the type of subject, the post-verbal constituent of the negated verb, the discourse topic, and the textual type. From an informational perspective, the status of the negated content restricts the occurrence of NEG3, suggesting that there is no free alternation between NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3. Interactional factors influence their functions and uses, and manual gestures are associated with these factors. The sample we analyzed enabled the categorization of a wide range of gestures. Many of these gestures may reflect idiosyncratic patterns, making it challenging to establish generalizations. However, we observed that the distribution of assertive structures includes gestures that signal the speaker's commitment to what is being said. Such commitment is metaphorically presented through the "open hand" gesture, which is highly frequent in Italian (Kendon, 2004) and identified in Brazilian Portuguese by Santos (2021). Modal structures, on the other hand, are performed with gestures indicating distancing from undesirable elements or ideas. Similar movements are less frequent in propositional structures. These findings reinforce assumptions about the multimodal nature of language and the complexity of negation, which extends beyond grammatical structure.
id UFS-2_74f6220aae30cd6efbe6e811b4693967
oai_identifier_str oai:oai:ri.ufs.br:repo_01:riufs/23860
network_acronym_str UFS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFS
repository_id_str
spelling Cardoso, Paloma BatistaFreitag, Raquel Meister Ko.2025-11-14T19:43:48Z2025-11-14T19:43:48Z2025-02-21CARDOSO, Paloma Batista. Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro. 2025. 164 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras) — Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2025.https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/23860Negation is a property common to all natural languages. Often understood as indicative of opposition, it encompasses syntactic-semantic and pragmatic processes. Through negation, speakers demonstrate commitment to something, perform subjective evaluations, or alter the propositional status of a sentence. Negation assumes assertive, modal, and propositional functions. Through it, speakers influence the actions of their listeners. In doing so, they perform speech acts that are not solely structured by grammatical items. Speech acts also involve manual gestures, highlighting the multimodal nature of language. Multimodal studies in English, French, and German (Kendon, 2004; Harrison, 2010; Bressem; Müller, 2014) argue that rejection, opposition, and negative evaluation are functions indicated by grammatical items and manual movements. From this perspective, negation operates in layers. In Brazilian Portuguese, studies on negation are traditionally conducted from two perspectives: variationist and/or informational. Não is the quintessential negation adverb. This lexical item can scope over nouns and verbs. When it scopes over verbs, it can appear in pre-verbal position (NEG1), in double position (NEG2), or in post-verbal position (NEG3). From a sociolinguistic perspective, the three possibilities of verbal negation constitute a variable phenomenon. In this framework, the use of one form or another is associated with grammatical and social factors. Conversely, from an informational perspective, the use of NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3 is constrained by the informational status of the negated content and provides clues about the communicative intentions between speaker and listener. Grammatical and informational factors are highly relevant to negation. However, by themselves, they are insufficient to explain the functions of this property. Interactions between speakers and listeners also involve the body, which "speaks" as well. In this thesis, we investigate whether manual gestures within the scope of the particle não constitute multimodal negation structures with distinct pragmatic functions. To this end, we analyzed negation data from 23 interviews in the Embodied Language 2023 sample. From these, we selected instances of NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3 performed simultaneously with manual gestures. Subsequently, we coded the grammatical, informational, and gestural aspects of the negation structures according to the methodology proposed in the Linguistic Annotation System (Bressem; Ladewig, 2011), enabling the analysis of their functions through association tests. We conclude that negation is a speech act that operates in three dimensions. Grammatical factors associated with its function include the semanticpragmatic feature of the verb within the scope of não, the type of verb, the type of subject, the post-verbal constituent of the negated verb, the discourse topic, and the textual type. From an informational perspective, the status of the negated content restricts the occurrence of NEG3, suggesting that there is no free alternation between NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3. Interactional factors influence their functions and uses, and manual gestures are associated with these factors. The sample we analyzed enabled the categorization of a wide range of gestures. Many of these gestures may reflect idiosyncratic patterns, making it challenging to establish generalizations. However, we observed that the distribution of assertive structures includes gestures that signal the speaker's commitment to what is being said. Such commitment is metaphorically presented through the "open hand" gesture, which is highly frequent in Italian (Kendon, 2004) and identified in Brazilian Portuguese by Santos (2021). Modal structures, on the other hand, are performed with gestures indicating distancing from undesirable elements or ideas. Similar movements are less frequent in propositional structures. These findings reinforce assumptions about the multimodal nature of language and the complexity of negation, which extends beyond grammatical structure.A negação é uma propriedade comum a todas as línguas naturais. Frequentemente entendida como indicativo de oposição, engloba processos sintático-semânticos e pragmáticos. Ao negar, os falantes demonstram comprometimento com algo, realizam avaliações subjetivas ou alteram o status proposicional de uma sentença. A negação assume funções assertivas, modais e proposicionais. Por meio dela, os falantes influenciam as ações daqueles que os ouvem. Desse modo, eles executam atos de fala que não são estruturados apenas por itens gramaticais. Atos de fala envolvem, também, gestos manuais, o que sinaliza o caráter multimodal da língua. Estudos de abordagem multimodal em inglês, francês e alemão (Kendon, 2004; Harrison, 2010; Bressem; Müller, 2014) defendem que rejeição, oposição e avaliação negativa são funções indicadas por itens gramaticais e movimentos manuais. Nessa perspectiva, a negação acontece em camadas. No português brasileiro, estudos sobre negação são tradicionalmente executados em duas perspectivas: variacionaista e/ou informacional. Não é o advérbio de negação por excelência. Esse item lexical pode tomar como escopo nomes e verbos. Quando toma como escopo verbos, pode estar em posição pré-verbal (NEG1), dupla (NEG2), ou em posição pós-verbal (NEG3). Do ponto de vista sociolinguista, as três possibilidades de negação verbal constituem um fenômeno variável. Nessa perspectiva, o uso de uma ou de outra forma está associado a fatores gramaticais e sociais. Por outro lado, do ponto de vista informacional, o uso de NEG1, NEG2 e de NEG3 sofre restrições do status informacional da informação negada, e dá pistas das intenções comunicativas entre falante e ouvinte. Fatores gramaticais e informacionais são de grande relevância para a negação. Todavia, sozinhos, eles não são suficientes para explicar as funções dessa propriedade. As ações entre falantes e ouvintes também envolvem o corpo, que também fala. A partir dessa suposição, investigamos se gestos manuais no escopo da partícula não constituem estruturas de negação multimodais com funções pragmáticas distintas. Para isso, analisamos dados de negação retirados de 23 entrevistas da amostra Linguagem Corporificada 2023. A partir delas, selecionamos as realizações de NEG1, NEG2 e de N2G3 executadas simultaneamente a gestos manuais. Posteriormente, codificamos os aspectos gramaticais, informacionais e gestuais das estruturas de negação, de acordo com a metodologia proposta no Linguistic Annotation System (Bressem; Ladewig, 2011), de modo a possibilitar a análise de sua função a partir de testes de associação. Concluímos que a negação é um ato de fala que ocorre em três dimensões. Há fatores gramaticais associados à sua função, tais como traço semânticopragmático do verbo no escopo de não, tipo de verbo, tipo de sujeito, constituinte pósverbal do verbo negado, tópico discursivo e tipo textual. Do ponto de vista informacional, o status da informação negada restringe a ocorrência de NEG3, o que sugere que não há livre alternância entre NEG1, NEG2 e NEG3: há fatores interacionais que influenciam suas funções e usos. Associados a eles, estão os gestos manuais. A amostra que analisamos possibilitou a categorização de um amplo conjunto de gestos. Muitos deles podem refletir padrões idiossincráticos, o que dificultou o delineamento de generalizações. Contudo, observamos que a distribuição de estruturas assertivas inclui gestos que sinalizam comprometimento, por parte do falante, com relação ao que é dito. Tal comprometimento é metaforicamente apresentado por meio do gesto mão aberta, altamente frequente no italiano (Kendon, 2004) e identificado, no português brasileiro, por Santos (2021). Estruturas modais, por outro lado, são executadas com gestos que indicam distância de elementos ou ideias indesejadas. Movimentos semelhantes são menos frequentes em estruturas proposicionais.Tais resultados fortalecem suposições sobre o caráter multimodal da língua e sobre a complexidade da negação, que vai além da estrutura gramatical.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESSão CristóvãoporNegaçãoMultimodalidadeGestos manuaisGestos das mãosNegationMultimodalityManual gesturesHand gesturesLINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRASEntre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisPós-Graduação em LetrasUniversidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81475https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/23860/1/license.txt098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44cMD51ORIGINALPALOMA_BATISTA_CARDOSO.pdfPALOMA_BATISTA_CARDOSO.pdfapplication/pdf6141044https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/23860/2/PALOMA_BATISTA_CARDOSO.pdfa46c67c771ac81a59e8abd876ae94cc8MD52riufs/238602025-11-14 16:43:53.946oai:oai:ri.ufs.br:repo_01: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2025-11-14T19:43:53Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
title Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
spellingShingle Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
Cardoso, Paloma Batista
Negação
Multimodalidade
Gestos manuais
Gestos das mãos
Negation
Multimodality
Manual gestures
Hand gestures
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
title_short Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
title_full Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
title_fullStr Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
title_full_unstemmed Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
title_sort Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro
author Cardoso, Paloma Batista
author_facet Cardoso, Paloma Batista
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Paloma Batista
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko.
contributor_str_mv Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Negação
Multimodalidade
Gestos manuais
Gestos das mãos
topic Negação
Multimodalidade
Gestos manuais
Gestos das mãos
Negation
Multimodality
Manual gestures
Hand gestures
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Negation
Multimodality
Manual gestures
Hand gestures
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
description Negation is a property common to all natural languages. Often understood as indicative of opposition, it encompasses syntactic-semantic and pragmatic processes. Through negation, speakers demonstrate commitment to something, perform subjective evaluations, or alter the propositional status of a sentence. Negation assumes assertive, modal, and propositional functions. Through it, speakers influence the actions of their listeners. In doing so, they perform speech acts that are not solely structured by grammatical items. Speech acts also involve manual gestures, highlighting the multimodal nature of language. Multimodal studies in English, French, and German (Kendon, 2004; Harrison, 2010; Bressem; Müller, 2014) argue that rejection, opposition, and negative evaluation are functions indicated by grammatical items and manual movements. From this perspective, negation operates in layers. In Brazilian Portuguese, studies on negation are traditionally conducted from two perspectives: variationist and/or informational. Não is the quintessential negation adverb. This lexical item can scope over nouns and verbs. When it scopes over verbs, it can appear in pre-verbal position (NEG1), in double position (NEG2), or in post-verbal position (NEG3). From a sociolinguistic perspective, the three possibilities of verbal negation constitute a variable phenomenon. In this framework, the use of one form or another is associated with grammatical and social factors. Conversely, from an informational perspective, the use of NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3 is constrained by the informational status of the negated content and provides clues about the communicative intentions between speaker and listener. Grammatical and informational factors are highly relevant to negation. However, by themselves, they are insufficient to explain the functions of this property. Interactions between speakers and listeners also involve the body, which "speaks" as well. In this thesis, we investigate whether manual gestures within the scope of the particle não constitute multimodal negation structures with distinct pragmatic functions. To this end, we analyzed negation data from 23 interviews in the Embodied Language 2023 sample. From these, we selected instances of NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3 performed simultaneously with manual gestures. Subsequently, we coded the grammatical, informational, and gestural aspects of the negation structures according to the methodology proposed in the Linguistic Annotation System (Bressem; Ladewig, 2011), enabling the analysis of their functions through association tests. We conclude that negation is a speech act that operates in three dimensions. Grammatical factors associated with its function include the semanticpragmatic feature of the verb within the scope of não, the type of verb, the type of subject, the post-verbal constituent of the negated verb, the discourse topic, and the textual type. From an informational perspective, the status of the negated content restricts the occurrence of NEG3, suggesting that there is no free alternation between NEG1, NEG2, and NEG3. Interactional factors influence their functions and uses, and manual gestures are associated with these factors. The sample we analyzed enabled the categorization of a wide range of gestures. Many of these gestures may reflect idiosyncratic patterns, making it challenging to establish generalizations. However, we observed that the distribution of assertive structures includes gestures that signal the speaker's commitment to what is being said. Such commitment is metaphorically presented through the "open hand" gesture, which is highly frequent in Italian (Kendon, 2004) and identified in Brazilian Portuguese by Santos (2021). Modal structures, on the other hand, are performed with gestures indicating distancing from undesirable elements or ideas. Similar movements are less frequent in propositional structures. These findings reinforce assumptions about the multimodal nature of language and the complexity of negation, which extends beyond grammatical structure.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2025-11-14T19:43:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2025-11-14T19:43:48Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2025-02-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv CARDOSO, Paloma Batista. Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro. 2025. 164 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras) — Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2025.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/23860
identifier_str_mv CARDOSO, Paloma Batista. Entre palavras e gestos manuais: uma abordagem multimodal da negação no português brasileiro. 2025. 164 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras) — Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2025.
url https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/23860
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Pós-Graduação em Letras
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS
instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
instacron:UFS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
instacron_str UFS
institution UFS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/23860/1/license.txt
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/23860/2/PALOMA_BATISTA_CARDOSO.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44c
a46c67c771ac81a59e8abd876ae94cc8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@academico.ufs.br
_version_ 1851759374033223680