Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2013
Autor(a) principal: Nishimura, Camila dos Santos lattes
Orientador(a): Popadiuk, Silvio lattes
Banca de defesa: Godoy, Arilda Schmidt lattes, Rodrigues, Leonel Cezar lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Administração de Empresas
Departamento: Administração
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23425
Resumo: This dissertation involved four constructs in organizational strategy area: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity and technology readiness. The main objective was to evaluate the degree of association between exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity and technology readiness. To achieve this main objective it was developed a quantitative research study with students as unity of analysis. The research was conducted in Business Administration and International Business courses in a private university located in São Paulo city. The questionnaire was developed using two scales. The first one was adapted for the measurement of the guidelines for exploration and exploitation developed by Popadiuk (2012) and the other scale was developed by Parasuraman (2000) to measure technology readiness index. To describe results, it was used descriptive statistics. The research hypothesis was related to the comparison between means of the technology readiness index according to individual orientation to exploration, exploitation or ambidexterity. Structural equation modeling method and ANOVA analysis was used and applied by the PLS PM technique for checking and comparing the relationship between the constructs. The results showed that is possible to develop a scale for measurement exploration, exploitation or ambidexterity individual orientation based on model developed by Popadiuk (2012) and using a competency model proposed by Cheetam e Chivers (2005) as base of desired transposition. The statistical analysis results, based on 392 answered questionnaires, confirmed that some dimensions of technology readiness construct can vary by individual orientation to explorer, exploiter or ambidexterity.
id UPM_ea6aea89a7cc5b0f057ae47765219cd3
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.mackenzie.br:10899/23425
network_acronym_str UPM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling 2016-03-15T19:26:01Z2020-05-28T18:03:56Z2013-10-082020-05-28T18:03:56Z2013-01-22http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23425This dissertation involved four constructs in organizational strategy area: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity and technology readiness. The main objective was to evaluate the degree of association between exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity and technology readiness. To achieve this main objective it was developed a quantitative research study with students as unity of analysis. The research was conducted in Business Administration and International Business courses in a private university located in São Paulo city. The questionnaire was developed using two scales. The first one was adapted for the measurement of the guidelines for exploration and exploitation developed by Popadiuk (2012) and the other scale was developed by Parasuraman (2000) to measure technology readiness index. To describe results, it was used descriptive statistics. The research hypothesis was related to the comparison between means of the technology readiness index according to individual orientation to exploration, exploitation or ambidexterity. Structural equation modeling method and ANOVA analysis was used and applied by the PLS PM technique for checking and comparing the relationship between the constructs. The results showed that is possible to develop a scale for measurement exploration, exploitation or ambidexterity individual orientation based on model developed by Popadiuk (2012) and using a competency model proposed by Cheetam e Chivers (2005) as base of desired transposition. The statistical analysis results, based on 392 answered questionnaires, confirmed that some dimensions of technology readiness construct can vary by individual orientation to explorer, exploiter or ambidexterity.Esta dissertação envolveu quatro construtos da área de estratégia organizacional: exploração , explotação , ambidestria e prontidão para tecnologia . O objetivo principal foi avaliar o grau de associação entre orientação individual para exploração , explotação e ambidestria e a prontidão para tecnologia . Para o atingimento deste objetivo foi desenvolvida uma pesquisa de caráter quantitativo, tendo como nível de análise alunos de graduação dos cursos de administração de empresas e comércio internacional de uma universidade privada localizada na cidade de São Paulo/SP. O questionário utilizado na pesquisa envolveu a utilização de duas escalas. Uma para a mensuração das orientações para exploração e explotação, baseada no modelo desenvolvido por Popadiuk (2012) e a outra referente à mensuração prontidão para tecnologia, desenvolvida por Parasuraman (2000). As análises estatísticas relativas aos objetivos foram de caráter descritivo. A hipótese de pesquisa foi baseada na comparação dos valores médios das avaliações de prontidão para tecnologia , segundo a categoria individual de orientação: exploradora, explotadora ou ambidestra. Para isso, a técnica utilizada envolveu a Modelagem de Equações Estruturais, mediante o software PLS-PM e a análise de variância ANOVA. Os resultados demonstraram que é possível realizar a transposição das dimensões propostas por Popadiuk (2012) do contexto organizacional para o nível individual, utilizando-se como norteador para esta transposição o modelo de competências proposto por Cheetam e Chivers (2005). Adicionalmente, a análise estatística dos dados, obtidos a partir de uma amostra de 392 questionários respondidos, permite identificar que algumas das dimensões da prontidão para tecnologia, conforme proposto por Parasuraman (2000) apresentam médias significantemente diferentes de acordo com o perfil individual para exploração, explotação ou ambidestria.application/pdfporUniversidade Presbiteriana MackenzieAdministração de EmpresasUPMBRAdministraçãoexploraçãoexplotaçãoambidestriaprontidão para tecnologiaexplorationexploitationambidexteritytechnology readinessCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESASOrientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPopadiuk, Silviohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1784002683973468Godoy, Arilda Schmidthttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8335648990336274Rodrigues, Leonel Cezarhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9075295558587388http://lattes.cnpq.br/1713952812970023Nishimura, Camila dos Santoshttp://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/retrieve/2751/Camila%20dos%20Santos%20Nishimura.pdf.jpghttp://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/bitstream/tede/595/1/Camila%20dos%20Santos%20Nishimura.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIE10899/234252020-05-28 15:03:56.622Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/PRI
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
title Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
spellingShingle Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
Nishimura, Camila dos Santos
exploração
explotação
ambidestria
prontidão para tecnologia
exploration
exploitation
ambidexterity
technology readiness
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS
title_short Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
title_full Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
title_fullStr Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
title_full_unstemmed Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
title_sort Orientação individual para exploração (exploration) e explotação (exploitation) e prontidão para tecnologia
author Nishimura, Camila dos Santos
author_facet Nishimura, Camila dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Popadiuk, Silvio
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1784002683973468
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Godoy, Arilda Schmidt
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8335648990336274
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Leonel Cezar
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9075295558587388
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1713952812970023
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nishimura, Camila dos Santos
contributor_str_mv Popadiuk, Silvio
Godoy, Arilda Schmidt
Rodrigues, Leonel Cezar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv exploração
explotação
ambidestria
prontidão para tecnologia
topic exploração
explotação
ambidestria
prontidão para tecnologia
exploration
exploitation
ambidexterity
technology readiness
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv exploration
exploitation
ambidexterity
technology readiness
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS
description This dissertation involved four constructs in organizational strategy area: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity and technology readiness. The main objective was to evaluate the degree of association between exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity and technology readiness. To achieve this main objective it was developed a quantitative research study with students as unity of analysis. The research was conducted in Business Administration and International Business courses in a private university located in São Paulo city. The questionnaire was developed using two scales. The first one was adapted for the measurement of the guidelines for exploration and exploitation developed by Popadiuk (2012) and the other scale was developed by Parasuraman (2000) to measure technology readiness index. To describe results, it was used descriptive statistics. The research hypothesis was related to the comparison between means of the technology readiness index according to individual orientation to exploration, exploitation or ambidexterity. Structural equation modeling method and ANOVA analysis was used and applied by the PLS PM technique for checking and comparing the relationship between the constructs. The results showed that is possible to develop a scale for measurement exploration, exploitation or ambidexterity individual orientation based on model developed by Popadiuk (2012) and using a competency model proposed by Cheetam e Chivers (2005) as base of desired transposition. The statistical analysis results, based on 392 answered questionnaires, confirmed that some dimensions of technology readiness construct can vary by individual orientation to explorer, exploiter or ambidexterity.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2013-10-08
2020-05-28T18:03:56Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-01-22
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-03-15T19:26:01Z
2020-05-28T18:03:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23425
url http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23425
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Administração de Empresas
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UPM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1757174457640681472