From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2025
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Izaque Dione
Orientador(a): Thom, Lucinéia Heloisa
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/298643
Resumo: One of the tools used by Business Process Management (BPM) to optimize processes within an organization is Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which involves the development of software robots (bots). These bots are programmed to mimic human behavior with systems. RPA adoption in the global market is growing rapidly, but even with innovative investments and market enthusiasm, approximately 30% to 50% of initial RPA projects fail. The lack of a clear map detailing the most common barriers and offering a set of countermeasures, leads organizations to navigate a costly and inefficient process of trial and error. It is precisely this lack of systematized knowledge that constitutes the central problem investigated in this work. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to develop a taxonomy for RPA limitations in organizational settings, as well as to present the countermeasures defined in the literature, and to propose a prospective analysis of how the capabilities of Generative Artificial Intelligence can be applied as a new class of countermeasures to these limitations. To achieve this objective, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted. The search was conducted in academic databases, resulting in a final selection of 94 primary studies for in-depth analysis. These were then subjected to a thematic analysis to synthesize the results and generate the taxonomy. As a result, 10 limitations were identified and cataloged, which were grouped into a taxonomy of three categories: Strategic, Organizational, and Technical Limitations. An analysis revealed that, in addition to technical challenges such as the fragility of robots, strategic and organizational barriers are critical factors for failure. The main contributions of this work are: (i) A consolidated taxonomy of RPA limitations, classifying 10 defined RPA limitations into strategic, organizational/human, and technical categories, providing a clear map of the problem space. (ii) A prospective analysis that maps Generative AI capabilities as solutions to the identified limitations, proposing a transition from "task automation" to "knowledge automation". (iii) A knowledge base and taxonomy for RPA limitations that can be used to develop an instrument to assess the maturity of RPA implementation in organizations. It concludes that Generative AI can be used to help overcome RPA limitations and has the potential to redefine the way process automation is performed. The synergy between the two technologies represents a fundamental transition from “task automation” to “knowledge automation”.
id URGS_41194c55adb03af535f5a579b39809f5
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/298643
network_acronym_str URGS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Nunes, Izaque DioneThom, Lucinéia Heloisa2025-11-02T08:00:21Z2025http://hdl.handle.net/10183/298643001296441One of the tools used by Business Process Management (BPM) to optimize processes within an organization is Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which involves the development of software robots (bots). These bots are programmed to mimic human behavior with systems. RPA adoption in the global market is growing rapidly, but even with innovative investments and market enthusiasm, approximately 30% to 50% of initial RPA projects fail. The lack of a clear map detailing the most common barriers and offering a set of countermeasures, leads organizations to navigate a costly and inefficient process of trial and error. It is precisely this lack of systematized knowledge that constitutes the central problem investigated in this work. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to develop a taxonomy for RPA limitations in organizational settings, as well as to present the countermeasures defined in the literature, and to propose a prospective analysis of how the capabilities of Generative Artificial Intelligence can be applied as a new class of countermeasures to these limitations. To achieve this objective, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted. The search was conducted in academic databases, resulting in a final selection of 94 primary studies for in-depth analysis. These were then subjected to a thematic analysis to synthesize the results and generate the taxonomy. As a result, 10 limitations were identified and cataloged, which were grouped into a taxonomy of three categories: Strategic, Organizational, and Technical Limitations. An analysis revealed that, in addition to technical challenges such as the fragility of robots, strategic and organizational barriers are critical factors for failure. The main contributions of this work are: (i) A consolidated taxonomy of RPA limitations, classifying 10 defined RPA limitations into strategic, organizational/human, and technical categories, providing a clear map of the problem space. (ii) A prospective analysis that maps Generative AI capabilities as solutions to the identified limitations, proposing a transition from "task automation" to "knowledge automation". (iii) A knowledge base and taxonomy for RPA limitations that can be used to develop an instrument to assess the maturity of RPA implementation in organizations. It concludes that Generative AI can be used to help overcome RPA limitations and has the potential to redefine the way process automation is performed. The synergy between the two technologies represents a fundamental transition from “task automation” to “knowledge automation”.application/pdfengGerenciamento de processos de negóciosAutomação Robótica de ProcessosInteligência artificial generativaAutomação inteligenteTask automationKnowledge automationFrom task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenarioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulInstituto de InformáticaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ComputaçãoPorto Alegre, BR-RS2025mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001296441.pdf.txt001296441.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain185188http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/298643/2/001296441.pdf.txt2cce50753e97698063ff88890927316cMD52ORIGINAL001296441.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1341681http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/298643/1/001296441.pdfda90b2ef27c60936a546aacfc6390c13MD5110183/2986432025-11-03 09:01:47.920343oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/298643Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/2PUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.br || lume@ufrgs.bropendoar:18532025-11-03T11:01:47Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
title From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
spellingShingle From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
Nunes, Izaque Dione
Gerenciamento de processos de negócios
Automação Robótica de Processos
Inteligência artificial generativa
Automação inteligente
Task automation
Knowledge automation
title_short From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
title_full From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
title_fullStr From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
title_full_unstemmed From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
title_sort From task automation to knowledge automation : a systematic review of RPA limitations and prospective analysis of generative AI in this scenario
author Nunes, Izaque Dione
author_facet Nunes, Izaque Dione
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Izaque Dione
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Thom, Lucinéia Heloisa
contributor_str_mv Thom, Lucinéia Heloisa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gerenciamento de processos de negócios
Automação Robótica de Processos
Inteligência artificial generativa
Automação inteligente
topic Gerenciamento de processos de negócios
Automação Robótica de Processos
Inteligência artificial generativa
Automação inteligente
Task automation
Knowledge automation
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Task automation
Knowledge automation
description One of the tools used by Business Process Management (BPM) to optimize processes within an organization is Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which involves the development of software robots (bots). These bots are programmed to mimic human behavior with systems. RPA adoption in the global market is growing rapidly, but even with innovative investments and market enthusiasm, approximately 30% to 50% of initial RPA projects fail. The lack of a clear map detailing the most common barriers and offering a set of countermeasures, leads organizations to navigate a costly and inefficient process of trial and error. It is precisely this lack of systematized knowledge that constitutes the central problem investigated in this work. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to develop a taxonomy for RPA limitations in organizational settings, as well as to present the countermeasures defined in the literature, and to propose a prospective analysis of how the capabilities of Generative Artificial Intelligence can be applied as a new class of countermeasures to these limitations. To achieve this objective, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted. The search was conducted in academic databases, resulting in a final selection of 94 primary studies for in-depth analysis. These were then subjected to a thematic analysis to synthesize the results and generate the taxonomy. As a result, 10 limitations were identified and cataloged, which were grouped into a taxonomy of three categories: Strategic, Organizational, and Technical Limitations. An analysis revealed that, in addition to technical challenges such as the fragility of robots, strategic and organizational barriers are critical factors for failure. The main contributions of this work are: (i) A consolidated taxonomy of RPA limitations, classifying 10 defined RPA limitations into strategic, organizational/human, and technical categories, providing a clear map of the problem space. (ii) A prospective analysis that maps Generative AI capabilities as solutions to the identified limitations, proposing a transition from "task automation" to "knowledge automation". (iii) A knowledge base and taxonomy for RPA limitations that can be used to develop an instrument to assess the maturity of RPA implementation in organizations. It concludes that Generative AI can be used to help overcome RPA limitations and has the potential to redefine the way process automation is performed. The synergy between the two technologies represents a fundamental transition from “task automation” to “knowledge automation”.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2025-11-02T08:00:21Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2025
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/298643
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001296441
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/298643
identifier_str_mv 001296441
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/298643/2/001296441.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/298643/1/001296441.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2cce50753e97698063ff88890927316c
da90b2ef27c60936a546aacfc6390c13
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br || lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1854319306278436864