A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Luciana Hartmann lattes
Orientador(a): Staut Júnior, Sérgio Said
Banca de defesa: Padilha, Maria da Graça Saldanha, Santos, Anderson Marcos dos
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Psicologia
Departamento: Psicologia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Resumo em Inglês: The Shared Guard was introduced in Brazil by Law 11688/08 which conceptualized the institute in the Brazilian Civil Code in art. 1.583§1º as "joint responsibility and the exercise of the rights and duties of the father and mother who do not live under the same roof, concerning the family power of the common children." Until December 2014, shared custody was applied according to the same law "whenever possible" when there was no consensus between the parents. In December 2014 came into force Law 13.058 / 14, which now considers shared custody as a rule within the legal system, regardless of the parents' consent. The shared custody institute was implemented in Brazil after many countries have already implemented this type of custody and it is perceived that in each country there are different requirements for its implementation. The judgments on shared custody were analyzed empirically in the Superior Court of Justice, the court that has the function of standardizing the interpretation of the law in every country and that the first degree judges must follow this interpretation. It was analyzed the importance of the psychological reports in these trials and if they were followed. It was noticed that the court neutralizes the abstract legal concepts as well as the importance of the report and that there is not a necessary interdisciplinarity between Psychology and Law in the application of the institute of shared custody.
Link de acesso: http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1468
Resumo: The Shared Guard was introduced in Brazil by Law 11688/08 which conceptualized the institute in the Brazilian Civil Code in art. 1.583§1º as "joint responsibility and the exercise of the rights and duties of the father and mother who do not live under the same roof, concerning the family power of the common children." Until December 2014, shared custody was applied according to the same law "whenever possible" when there was no consensus between the parents. In December 2014 came into force Law 13.058 / 14, which now considers shared custody as a rule within the legal system, regardless of the parents' consent. The shared custody institute was implemented in Brazil after many countries have already implemented this type of custody and it is perceived that in each country there are different requirements for its implementation. The judgments on shared custody were analyzed empirically in the Superior Court of Justice, the court that has the function of standardizing the interpretation of the law in every country and that the first degree judges must follow this interpretation. It was analyzed the importance of the psychological reports in these trials and if they were followed. It was noticed that the court neutralizes the abstract legal concepts as well as the importance of the report and that there is not a necessary interdisciplinarity between Psychology and Law in the application of the institute of shared custody.
id UTP_ffc6254dcaea276b41e699768d2fc514
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:tede/1468
network_acronym_str UTP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
spelling Staut Júnior, Sérgio SaidPadilha, Maria da Graça SaldanhaSantos, Anderson Marcos doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2561965577591651Silva, Luciana Hartmann2018-07-24T16:10:49Z2018-05-06Silva, Luciana Hartmann. A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense. 2018. 62 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Psicologia) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2018http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1468The Shared Guard was introduced in Brazil by Law 11688/08 which conceptualized the institute in the Brazilian Civil Code in art. 1.583§1º as "joint responsibility and the exercise of the rights and duties of the father and mother who do not live under the same roof, concerning the family power of the common children." Until December 2014, shared custody was applied according to the same law "whenever possible" when there was no consensus between the parents. In December 2014 came into force Law 13.058 / 14, which now considers shared custody as a rule within the legal system, regardless of the parents' consent. The shared custody institute was implemented in Brazil after many countries have already implemented this type of custody and it is perceived that in each country there are different requirements for its implementation. The judgments on shared custody were analyzed empirically in the Superior Court of Justice, the court that has the function of standardizing the interpretation of the law in every country and that the first degree judges must follow this interpretation. It was analyzed the importance of the psychological reports in these trials and if they were followed. It was noticed that the court neutralizes the abstract legal concepts as well as the importance of the report and that there is not a necessary interdisciplinarity between Psychology and Law in the application of the institute of shared custody.A Guarda Compartilhada foi introduzida no Brasil pela Lei 11.698/08, que conceituou o instituto no Código Civil brasileiro no art. 1.583§1º como: “a responsabilização conjunta e o exercício de direitos e deveres do pai e da mãe que não vivam sob o mesmo teto, concernentes ao poder familiar dos filhos comuns.” Até dezembro de 2014 a guarda compartilhada era aplicada conforme a mesma lei “, sempre que possível” quando não houvesse consenso entre os pais. Em dezembro de 2014, entrou em vigor a Lei 13.058/14 que passou a considerar a guarda compartilhada como regra dentro do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, independentemente do consenso dos pais. O instituto da guarda compartilhada foi implementado no país, após muitos países já terem implementado este tipo de guarda e percebe-se que em cada país, há requisitos diferentes para sua implementação. Foram analisados empiricamente os julgados sobre a guarda compartilhada no Superior Tribunal de Justiça, a corte que tem função de uniformizar a interpretação da legislações em todo país, uma vez considerando que os juízes de primeiro grau devem seguir esta intepretação. Foi analisada a importância dos laudos psicológicos nestes julgados e se foram devidamenteseguidos. Percebeu-se que a corte neutraliza os conceitos jurídicos abstratos, como também a importância do laudo e que não há uma interdisciplinaridade necessária entre a Psicologia e o Direito na aplicação do instituto da guarda compartilhada.Submitted by Divanete Paiva (divanete.paiva@utp.br) on 2018-07-24T16:10:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 A GUARDA COMPARTILHADA NO SUPERIOR.pdf: 962954 bytes, checksum: de0bc1f75313eb0eab284cf1e983459e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-24T16:10:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 A GUARDA COMPARTILHADA NO SUPERIOR.pdf: 962954 bytes, checksum: de0bc1f75313eb0eab284cf1e983459e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-05-06application/pdfporUniversidade Tuiuti do ParanaMestrado em PsicologiaUTPBrasilPsicologiaGuarda compartilhada ou jointDecisões dos tribunaisPsicologia forenseShared or joint custodyCourt decisionsForensic psychologyCIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIAA guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forenseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-3503794138024189936500500600-20264806594006156123411867255817377423info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTPinstname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paranáinstacron:UTPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1468/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALA GUARDA COMPARTILHADA NO SUPERIOR.pdfA GUARDA COMPARTILHADA NO SUPERIOR.pdfapplication/pdf962954http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1468/2/A+GUARDA+COMPARTILHADA+NO+SUPERIOR.pdfde0bc1f75313eb0eab284cf1e983459eMD52tede/1468oai:localhost:tede/14682018-07-24 13:10:49.041TEDEtede@utp.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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
title A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
spellingShingle A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
Silva, Luciana Hartmann
Guarda compartilhada ou joint
Decisões dos tribunais
Psicologia forense
Shared or joint custody
Court decisions
Forensic psychology
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
title_short A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
title_full A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
title_fullStr A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
title_full_unstemmed A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
title_sort A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense
author Silva, Luciana Hartmann
author_facet Silva, Luciana Hartmann
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Staut Júnior, Sérgio Said
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Padilha, Maria da Graça Saldanha
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Santos, Anderson Marcos dos
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2561965577591651
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Luciana Hartmann
contributor_str_mv Staut Júnior, Sérgio Said
Padilha, Maria da Graça Saldanha
Santos, Anderson Marcos dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Guarda compartilhada ou joint
Decisões dos tribunais
Psicologia forense
topic Guarda compartilhada ou joint
Decisões dos tribunais
Psicologia forense
Shared or joint custody
Court decisions
Forensic psychology
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Shared or joint custody
Court decisions
Forensic psychology
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv The Shared Guard was introduced in Brazil by Law 11688/08 which conceptualized the institute in the Brazilian Civil Code in art. 1.583§1º as "joint responsibility and the exercise of the rights and duties of the father and mother who do not live under the same roof, concerning the family power of the common children." Until December 2014, shared custody was applied according to the same law "whenever possible" when there was no consensus between the parents. In December 2014 came into force Law 13.058 / 14, which now considers shared custody as a rule within the legal system, regardless of the parents' consent. The shared custody institute was implemented in Brazil after many countries have already implemented this type of custody and it is perceived that in each country there are different requirements for its implementation. The judgments on shared custody were analyzed empirically in the Superior Court of Justice, the court that has the function of standardizing the interpretation of the law in every country and that the first degree judges must follow this interpretation. It was analyzed the importance of the psychological reports in these trials and if they were followed. It was noticed that the court neutralizes the abstract legal concepts as well as the importance of the report and that there is not a necessary interdisciplinarity between Psychology and Law in the application of the institute of shared custody.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv A Guarda Compartilhada foi introduzida no Brasil pela Lei 11.698/08, que conceituou o instituto no Código Civil brasileiro no art. 1.583§1º como: “a responsabilização conjunta e o exercício de direitos e deveres do pai e da mãe que não vivam sob o mesmo teto, concernentes ao poder familiar dos filhos comuns.” Até dezembro de 2014 a guarda compartilhada era aplicada conforme a mesma lei “, sempre que possível” quando não houvesse consenso entre os pais. Em dezembro de 2014, entrou em vigor a Lei 13.058/14 que passou a considerar a guarda compartilhada como regra dentro do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, independentemente do consenso dos pais. O instituto da guarda compartilhada foi implementado no país, após muitos países já terem implementado este tipo de guarda e percebe-se que em cada país, há requisitos diferentes para sua implementação. Foram analisados empiricamente os julgados sobre a guarda compartilhada no Superior Tribunal de Justiça, a corte que tem função de uniformizar a interpretação da legislações em todo país, uma vez considerando que os juízes de primeiro grau devem seguir esta intepretação. Foi analisada a importância dos laudos psicológicos nestes julgados e se foram devidamenteseguidos. Percebeu-se que a corte neutraliza os conceitos jurídicos abstratos, como também a importância do laudo e que não há uma interdisciplinaridade necessária entre a Psicologia e o Direito na aplicação do instituto da guarda compartilhada.
description The Shared Guard was introduced in Brazil by Law 11688/08 which conceptualized the institute in the Brazilian Civil Code in art. 1.583§1º as "joint responsibility and the exercise of the rights and duties of the father and mother who do not live under the same roof, concerning the family power of the common children." Until December 2014, shared custody was applied according to the same law "whenever possible" when there was no consensus between the parents. In December 2014 came into force Law 13.058 / 14, which now considers shared custody as a rule within the legal system, regardless of the parents' consent. The shared custody institute was implemented in Brazil after many countries have already implemented this type of custody and it is perceived that in each country there are different requirements for its implementation. The judgments on shared custody were analyzed empirically in the Superior Court of Justice, the court that has the function of standardizing the interpretation of the law in every country and that the first degree judges must follow this interpretation. It was analyzed the importance of the psychological reports in these trials and if they were followed. It was noticed that the court neutralizes the abstract legal concepts as well as the importance of the report and that there is not a necessary interdisciplinarity between Psychology and Law in the application of the institute of shared custody.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-24T16:10:49Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-05-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Silva, Luciana Hartmann. A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense. 2018. 62 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Psicologia) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2018
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1468
identifier_str_mv Silva, Luciana Hartmann. A guarda compartilhada no superior tribunal de justiça à luz da psicologia forense. 2018. 62 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Psicologia) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2018
url http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1468
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -3503794138024189936
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -2026480659400615612
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 3411867255817377423
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Psicologia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UTP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Psicologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
instname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
instacron:UTP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP
instname_str Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná
instacron_str UTP
institution UTP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1468/1/license.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1468/2/A+GUARDA+COMPARTILHADA+NO+SUPERIOR.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
de0bc1f75313eb0eab284cf1e983459e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv TEDE
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tede@utp.br
_version_ 1623280925019209728