An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros
| Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil Campus Chapec? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o UFFS |
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3812 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this dissertation was to analyze images, from a gender perspective, of four textbooks approved by the PNLD/2019 notice addressed to early Childhood Education teachers. The books, entitled: Aprender com a crian?a: experi?ncia e conhecimento, by Editora Aut?ntica; Cad?? Achou! and P? de Brincadeira, by Editora Positivo, and Pr?ticas Comentadas para Inspirar, by Editora do Brasil, were analyzed from the interpretive context of Thompson?s (1995) theory articulated to the concept of gender proposed by Scott (1995; 2005; 2012), Butler (2018) and Louro (1997; 2001; 2011; 2018), as well in childhood studies by Sarmento (2005; 1007; 2012), Ari?s (1981) and Priore (2007), and on authors? textbook studies Bittencourt (1993) and Choppin (2002; 2004). This study made it possible to observe whether the images conveyed gender inequalities between the characters illustrated in their content. For this purpose, we have incorporated the methodological perspective of Depth Hermeneutics (DP) proposed by Thompson in its three phases: the first phase corresponding to the analysis of the socio-historical context, with the purpose of knowing the specific contexts in which symbolic forms, that is, textbooks, were produced, constructed and reproduced; the second phase, the formal or discursive analysis, based on Bardin?s (2016) Content Analysis (CA) and Penn?s (2002) Image Analysis (IA), theories that enlightened the internal analysis of these symbolic forms, and the third phase on the interpretation and reinterpretation of gender inequalities as a synthesis process that was linked to the results of the previous phases. From the one thousand seven hundred and twenty-four representations of the female and male gender, we selected and analyzed thirty-five images, which made it possible to understand that young children develop and position themselves based on a social place and looks that are assumed based on an adultcentric conception. In this sense, this observation has allowed us to verify that the images conveyed and chosen by the authors, tended to reproduce gender stereotypes by supporting the visualization of a patriarchal, and also racist, model in view of development phase of children?s identity. Thus, we consider that the results on the theme of gender and its inequalities made it possible to mature the looks at the images of the analyzed textbooks. Therefore, we propose to socialize this study and expose the need for more perspectives that may reveal other social focuses on these inequalities. |
| id |
UFFS_0660664a23714a27764b4df1bf1c13f2 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3812 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFFS |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?nerosEduca??o escolar b?sicaEduca??o infantilEduca??o escolarMaterial did?ticoEnsino e aprendizagemThe purpose of this dissertation was to analyze images, from a gender perspective, of four textbooks approved by the PNLD/2019 notice addressed to early Childhood Education teachers. The books, entitled: Aprender com a crian?a: experi?ncia e conhecimento, by Editora Aut?ntica; Cad?? Achou! and P? de Brincadeira, by Editora Positivo, and Pr?ticas Comentadas para Inspirar, by Editora do Brasil, were analyzed from the interpretive context of Thompson?s (1995) theory articulated to the concept of gender proposed by Scott (1995; 2005; 2012), Butler (2018) and Louro (1997; 2001; 2011; 2018), as well in childhood studies by Sarmento (2005; 1007; 2012), Ari?s (1981) and Priore (2007), and on authors? textbook studies Bittencourt (1993) and Choppin (2002; 2004). This study made it possible to observe whether the images conveyed gender inequalities between the characters illustrated in their content. For this purpose, we have incorporated the methodological perspective of Depth Hermeneutics (DP) proposed by Thompson in its three phases: the first phase corresponding to the analysis of the socio-historical context, with the purpose of knowing the specific contexts in which symbolic forms, that is, textbooks, were produced, constructed and reproduced; the second phase, the formal or discursive analysis, based on Bardin?s (2016) Content Analysis (CA) and Penn?s (2002) Image Analysis (IA), theories that enlightened the internal analysis of these symbolic forms, and the third phase on the interpretation and reinterpretation of gender inequalities as a synthesis process that was linked to the results of the previous phases. From the one thousand seven hundred and twenty-four representations of the female and male gender, we selected and analyzed thirty-five images, which made it possible to understand that young children develop and position themselves based on a social place and looks that are assumed based on an adultcentric conception. In this sense, this observation has allowed us to verify that the images conveyed and chosen by the authors, tended to reproduce gender stereotypes by supporting the visualization of a patriarchal, and also racist, model in view of development phase of children?s identity. Thus, we consider that the results on the theme of gender and its inequalities made it possible to mature the looks at the images of the analyzed textbooks. Therefore, we propose to socialize this study and expose the need for more perspectives that may reveal other social focuses on these inequalities.Esta disserta??o teve por objetivo a an?lise de imagens, na perspectiva de g?nero, dos quatro livros did?ticos aprovados pelo Edital do PNLD/2019 endere?ados a professoras (es) da Educa??o Infantil. Os livros que tiveram como t?tulo: Aprender com a crian?a: experi?ncia e conhecimento, da Editora Aut?ntica; Cad?? Achou! e P? de Brincadeira, da Editora Positivo, e Pr?ticas Comentadas para Inspirar, da Editora do Brasil foram analisados a partir do contexto interpretativo da teoria de Thompson (1995) articulada ao conceito de g?nero proposto por Scott (1995; 2005; 2012), Butler (2018) e Louro (1997; 2001; 2011; 2018), bem como nos estudos sobre inf?ncia de Sarmento (2005; 2007; 2012), Ari?s (1981) e Priore (2007), e sobre os estudos de livros did?ticos dos autores Bittencourt (1993) e Choppin (2002; 2004). Este estudo possibilitou observar se as imagens veiculadas enunciavam desigualdades de g?nero entre os personagens ilustrados em seus conte?dos. Para este intento, incorporamos a perspectiva metodol?gica da Hermen?utica de Profundidade (HP) proposta por Thompson a partir de suas tr?s fases: a primeira fase correspondente ? an?lise do contexto s?cio-hist?rico, com a finalidade de conhecer os contextos espec?ficos em que as formas simb?licas, ou seja, os livros did?ticos, foram produzidos, constru?dos e reproduzidos; a segunda fase, a an?lise formal ou discursiva a partir da An?lise de Conte?do (AC) de Bardin (2016) e An?lise de Imagens (AI) de Penn (2002), teorias que iluminaram a an?lise interna a essas formas simb?licas, e, a terceira fase sobre a interpreta??o e a reinterpreta??o das desigualdades de g?nero como processo de s?ntese ao qual articulou-se aos resultados das fases anteriores. Das mil setecentas e trinta e quatro representa??es do g?nero feminino e masculino selecionamos e analisamos trinta e cinco imagens, as quais possibilitaram apreender que as crian?as pequenas se desenvolvem e se posicionam a partir de um lugar social e de olhares que s?o assumidos com base em uma concep??o adultoc?ntrica. Nesse sentido esta observa??o nos permitiu verificar que as imagens veiculadas e escolhidas pelas autoras tenderam a reproduzir estere?tipos de g?nero ao sustentarem a visualiza??o de um modelo patriarcal e, tamb?m racista, tendo em vista a fase de desenvolvimento da identidade infantil. Com isso, ponderamos que os resultados sobre a tem?tica de g?nero e suas desigualdades possibilitaram amadurecer os olhares para as imagens dos livros did?ticos analisados. Propomos assim, socializar este estudo e expor a necessidade de mais olhares que possam revelar outros focos sociais sobre as desigualdades de g?nero.Universidade Federal da Fronteira SulBrasilCampus Chapec?Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??oUFFSMoura, Neide Cardoso deSilva, Ivone Maria MendesAndreis, Addriana MariaVicenzi, RenildaOliveira, Francielly de Lima2020-07-252020-09-09T11:56:41Z2020-07-212020-09-09T11:56:41Z2020-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesishttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3812porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)instacron:UFFS2021-09-30T16:39:41Zoai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3812Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/oai/requestfranciele.cruz@uffs.edu.bropendoar:39242021-09-30T16:39:41Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| title |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| spellingShingle |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros Oliveira, Francielly de Lima Educa??o escolar b?sica Educa??o infantil Educa??o escolar Material did?tico Ensino e aprendizagem |
| title_short |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| title_full |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| title_fullStr |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| title_full_unstemmed |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| title_sort |
An?lise de livros did?ticos do PNLD/2019 para a educa??o infantil: imagens e g?neros |
| author |
Oliveira, Francielly de Lima |
| author_facet |
Oliveira, Francielly de Lima |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Moura, Neide Cardoso de Silva, Ivone Maria Mendes Andreis, Addriana Maria Vicenzi, Renilda |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Francielly de Lima |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educa??o escolar b?sica Educa??o infantil Educa??o escolar Material did?tico Ensino e aprendizagem |
| topic |
Educa??o escolar b?sica Educa??o infantil Educa??o escolar Material did?tico Ensino e aprendizagem |
| description |
The purpose of this dissertation was to analyze images, from a gender perspective, of four textbooks approved by the PNLD/2019 notice addressed to early Childhood Education teachers. The books, entitled: Aprender com a crian?a: experi?ncia e conhecimento, by Editora Aut?ntica; Cad?? Achou! and P? de Brincadeira, by Editora Positivo, and Pr?ticas Comentadas para Inspirar, by Editora do Brasil, were analyzed from the interpretive context of Thompson?s (1995) theory articulated to the concept of gender proposed by Scott (1995; 2005; 2012), Butler (2018) and Louro (1997; 2001; 2011; 2018), as well in childhood studies by Sarmento (2005; 1007; 2012), Ari?s (1981) and Priore (2007), and on authors? textbook studies Bittencourt (1993) and Choppin (2002; 2004). This study made it possible to observe whether the images conveyed gender inequalities between the characters illustrated in their content. For this purpose, we have incorporated the methodological perspective of Depth Hermeneutics (DP) proposed by Thompson in its three phases: the first phase corresponding to the analysis of the socio-historical context, with the purpose of knowing the specific contexts in which symbolic forms, that is, textbooks, were produced, constructed and reproduced; the second phase, the formal or discursive analysis, based on Bardin?s (2016) Content Analysis (CA) and Penn?s (2002) Image Analysis (IA), theories that enlightened the internal analysis of these symbolic forms, and the third phase on the interpretation and reinterpretation of gender inequalities as a synthesis process that was linked to the results of the previous phases. From the one thousand seven hundred and twenty-four representations of the female and male gender, we selected and analyzed thirty-five images, which made it possible to understand that young children develop and position themselves based on a social place and looks that are assumed based on an adultcentric conception. In this sense, this observation has allowed us to verify that the images conveyed and chosen by the authors, tended to reproduce gender stereotypes by supporting the visualization of a patriarchal, and also racist, model in view of development phase of children?s identity. Thus, we consider that the results on the theme of gender and its inequalities made it possible to mature the looks at the images of the analyzed textbooks. Therefore, we propose to socialize this study and expose the need for more perspectives that may reveal other social focuses on these inequalities. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-25 2020-09-09T11:56:41Z 2020-07-21 2020-09-09T11:56:41Z 2020-07-25 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3812 |
| url |
https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3812 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brasil Campus Chapec? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o UFFS |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brasil Campus Chapec? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o UFFS |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) instacron:UFFS |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) |
| instacron_str |
UFFS |
| institution |
UFFS |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
franciele.cruz@uffs.edu.br |
| _version_ |
1868248302138425344 |