A judicialização do fornecimento de medicamentos no Sistema Único de Saúde

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Danilo Di Paiva Malheiros
• Orientador(a): Garcíazapata, Marco Túlio Antônio
• Banca de defesa: Garcíazapata, Marco Túlio Antônio, Itria, Alexander, Soares, Carolina Chaves, Leão, Ana Lúcia de Melo, Souza Júnior, Edson Sidião de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RMG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Saúde pública; Sistema Único de Saúde; Judicialização; Medicamento; Racionalização
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Juditialization of health; Public Health System; Judicialization; Medicine; Rationalization
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: OUTROS
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/12735

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the phenomenon of Judicialization of Health. METHODOLOGY: Mixed research involving a systematic literature review study and a quantitative and qualitative research. As for the systematic literature review, studies published between 2010 and 2021 were consulted. The quantitative research adopted a time frame between 2017 and 2019, contemplating a sample of 359 health lawsuits against the Municipality of Goiânia. The qualitative study adopted a bibliographical narrative review, with the following steps: selection of the topic and question of interest, definition of descriptors, definition of search sources, selection of relevant articles by reading the title and abstract, reading in full, extraction of the most important information from these articles and synthesis of the main findings. RESULTS: Most studies analyzed the legalization of drugs related to the official list of free distribution. A study from Colombia prioritized the increase in lawsuits. From Argentina, he found that the judges were not concerned about promoting equity. In Costa Rica, drugs were ranked according to their priorities. Of the lawsuits studied, more than half (53%) had a claim value between R$1,000.00 and R$50,000.00, aged between 18 and 59 years (49%), filed by the Goiás Public Defender's Office (78%) . Injunctions were granted in 92% and Nat-Jus heard in 22% of cases and final favorable judgment in 77%. Proposals point to the need for deep knowledge of Clinical Protocols and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDTs); adoption of organization and management of drug stocks; implementation of support centers for the Judiciary (NATJUS) and; creation of specialized rods. Implemented experiences: “SUS C.O.M VC” in Jundiaí-SP; Technical Support Center added to the Municipal Ombudsman in Araguarina-TO; Drug Conciliation Nucleus in Lages-SC; Regionalized Management Program for the Judicialization of Health in Santa Catarina; REMUME update in Canguçu-RS. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to engage all the professionals involved, demanding institutional dialogue and adopting a multicentric solution for the maintenance of the Public Health System. Proposals and practices for health rationalization are essential measures and deserve to migrate from specific experiences to a national scope.