A decisão judicial idealmente fundada
| Ano de defesa: | 2022 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Tese |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://hdl.handle.net/1843/47530 |
Resumo: | What should be the ideal reasoning of a judicial decision remains a question still unanswered. Brazilian law establishes that any judicial decision shall be grounded on reasoning, but it fails to establish what would be the ideal reasoning. This ideal, however, can be understood and identified, from a logical-normative point of view, if analyzed through the universal pure logical structures of Husserl’s transcendental idealism, which explore knowledge by distinguishing between empty meanings and filled meanings, as well as the structure of founded and founding parts, in the constitution of categorical objects, such as the judicial decision. Through the knowledge of these structures, it is possible to understand what is the normative ideal of the reasoning grounding a judicial decision, and to distinguish an ideally grounded judicial decision from one that does not meet this ideal. |
| id |
UFMG_06ecb44b5eb8e7fd8a41fb5a32009e7d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/47530 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
2022-11-29T13:05:07Z2025-09-09T00:35:30Z2022-11-29T13:05:07Z2022-08-19https://hdl.handle.net/1843/47530What should be the ideal reasoning of a judicial decision remains a question still unanswered. Brazilian law establishes that any judicial decision shall be grounded on reasoning, but it fails to establish what would be the ideal reasoning. This ideal, however, can be understood and identified, from a logical-normative point of view, if analyzed through the universal pure logical structures of Husserl’s transcendental idealism, which explore knowledge by distinguishing between empty meanings and filled meanings, as well as the structure of founded and founding parts, in the constitution of categorical objects, such as the judicial decision. Through the knowledge of these structures, it is possible to understand what is the normative ideal of the reasoning grounding a judicial decision, and to distinguish an ideally grounded judicial decision from one that does not meet this ideal.porUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisDecisão judicialProcesso judicialProcesso civilFundamentação idealObjetos categoriaisFenomenologiaDireitoFunção judicialFenomenologiaA decisão judicial idealmente fundadaThe ideal reasoning of a judicial decisioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisRodrigo Cândido Rodriguesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1003285042535763Maria Helena Damasceno e Silva Megalehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1225689902769020Alfredo Emanuel Farias de OliveiraAntônio Gomes de VasconcelosMarcelo Campos GaluppoMarco Antônio dos Santos Casa NovaA questão acerca do que seria a fundamentação ideal de uma decisão judicial permanece ainda sem solução. O Direito brasileiro estabelece que todas as decisões judiciais precisam ser fundadas, mas não esclarece bem o que seria uma fundamentação ideal. Este ideal, porém, pode ser compreendido e identificado, do ponto de vista lógico-normativo, se analisado através das estruturas universais lógico-puras do idealismo transcendental husserliano, que exploram o conhecimento distinguindo entre significações vazias e significações preenchidas, bem como a estrutura de fundantes e fundados, na constituição de objetos categoriais, tal como a decisão judicial. Por meio do conhecimento dessas estruturas, é possível compreender qual é o ideal normativo de fundamentação de uma decisão judicial, e distinguir uma decisão judicial idealmente fundada de uma que não atende a este ideal.BrasilDIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITOPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUFMGLICENSElicense.txttext/plain2118https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/37e34443-7594-4a26-8d50-1d064d3363ba/downloadcda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272MD51falseAnonymousREADORIGINALRodrigo C Rodrigues - A decisão judicial idealmente fundada.pdfapplication/pdf2597295https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/c2c5d8de-fd9f-4149-97c9-ce300878673c/downloada4d0f8969964dd284eb747e2ef4996aeMD52trueAnonymousREAD1843/475302025-09-08 21:35:30.457open.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/47530https://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-09T00:35:30Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)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 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv |
The ideal reasoning of a judicial decision |
| title |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| spellingShingle |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada Rodrigo Cândido Rodrigues Direito Função judicial Fenomenologia Decisão judicial Processo judicial Processo civil Fundamentação ideal Objetos categoriais Fenomenologia |
| title_short |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| title_full |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| title_fullStr |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| title_sort |
A decisão judicial idealmente fundada |
| author |
Rodrigo Cândido Rodrigues |
| author_facet |
Rodrigo Cândido Rodrigues |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigo Cândido Rodrigues |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Função judicial Fenomenologia |
| topic |
Direito Função judicial Fenomenologia Decisão judicial Processo judicial Processo civil Fundamentação ideal Objetos categoriais Fenomenologia |
| dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Decisão judicial Processo judicial Processo civil Fundamentação ideal Objetos categoriais Fenomenologia |
| description |
What should be the ideal reasoning of a judicial decision remains a question still unanswered. Brazilian law establishes that any judicial decision shall be grounded on reasoning, but it fails to establish what would be the ideal reasoning. This ideal, however, can be understood and identified, from a logical-normative point of view, if analyzed through the universal pure logical structures of Husserl’s transcendental idealism, which explore knowledge by distinguishing between empty meanings and filled meanings, as well as the structure of founded and founding parts, in the constitution of categorical objects, such as the judicial decision. Through the knowledge of these structures, it is possible to understand what is the normative ideal of the reasoning grounding a judicial decision, and to distinguish an ideally grounded judicial decision from one that does not meet this ideal. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-29T13:05:07Z 2025-09-09T00:35:30Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-29T13:05:07Z |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-19 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| format |
doctoralThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/47530 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/47530 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| instacron_str |
UFMG |
| institution |
UFMG |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/37e34443-7594-4a26-8d50-1d064d3363ba/download https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/c2c5d8de-fd9f-4149-97c9-ce300878673c/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
cda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272 a4d0f8969964dd284eb747e2ef4996ae |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufmg.br |
| _version_ |
1862105971051986944 |