Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Débora Carvalho Mascarenhas dos Anjos
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31987
Resumo: This dissertation seeks to analyze, in light of the 1988 Republic’s Constitution, whether the dichotomous criterion is determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies and if Law number 13.303/2016, in the part that is relative to the topic, applies to all state-owned companies, regardless of the activity performed. The research’s hypothesis consisted on the affirmation that the competitive criterion is determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies. As a theoretical framework, the work utilizes the classification proposed by Eros Roberto Grau, according to whom economic activities are those that are destined to satisfy the necessities of collectivity by means of the utilization of goods and services. Thus, both the public services and the economic activities in a strict sense are species of the gender economic activity in a broad sense. In order to achieve the general objective proposed, the methodology belonging to the legal-dogmatic angle was adopted. Stemming from the analysis of norms, doctrinal texts, legislation, as well as from the investigation of certain judgements, it was concluded that neither the dichotomous criterion nor the competitive one are determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies, but rather the criterion of the business model. It was also concluded that the Law number 13.303/2016 does not apply to all state-owned companies, regardless of the activity performed by them.
id UFMG_e2da0d4908030e835b7990803ffb0f0c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/31987
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2020-01-17T21:13:33Z2025-09-08T23:12:37Z2020-01-17T21:13:33Z2019-08-21https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31987This dissertation seeks to analyze, in light of the 1988 Republic’s Constitution, whether the dichotomous criterion is determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies and if Law number 13.303/2016, in the part that is relative to the topic, applies to all state-owned companies, regardless of the activity performed. The research’s hypothesis consisted on the affirmation that the competitive criterion is determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies. As a theoretical framework, the work utilizes the classification proposed by Eros Roberto Grau, according to whom economic activities are those that are destined to satisfy the necessities of collectivity by means of the utilization of goods and services. Thus, both the public services and the economic activities in a strict sense are species of the gender economic activity in a broad sense. In order to achieve the general objective proposed, the methodology belonging to the legal-dogmatic angle was adopted. Stemming from the analysis of norms, doctrinal texts, legislation, as well as from the investigation of certain judgements, it was concluded that neither the dichotomous criterion nor the competitive one are determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies, but rather the criterion of the business model. It was also concluded that the Law number 13.303/2016 does not apply to all state-owned companies, regardless of the activity performed by them.porUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisEmpresa estatalAtividade econômicaConcorrênciaModelo empresarialRegime jurídico de licitação e contratosLei nº 13.303/2016Direito administrativoEmpresas públicasSociedades de economia mista – BrasilLicitação públicaContrato públicoDefinição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisDébora Carvalho Mascarenhas dos Anjosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4250272351281785Cristiana Maria Fortini Pinto e Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3123980301720047Florivaldo Dutra de AraújoMaria Tereza Fonseca DiasAndré SaddyEsta dissertação procura analisar, à luz da Constituição da República de 1988, se o critério dicotômico é determinante para a definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais e se a Lei nº 13.303/2016, na parte relativa ao tema, aplica-se a todas as empresas estatais, independentemente da atividade desempenhada. A hipótese da pesquisa consistiu na afirmação de que o critério concorrencial é determinante para a definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais. Como marco teórico, o trabalho utiliza a classificação proposta por Eros Roberto Grau, segundo a qual as atividades econômicas são aquelas que se destinam a satisfazer as necessidades da coletividade por meio da utilização de bens e serviços. Assim, tanto os serviços públicos, quanto as atividades econômicas em sentido estrito são espécies do gênero atividade econômica em sentido amplo. A fim de atingir o objetivo geral proposto, adotou-se a metodologia pertencente à vertente jurídico-dogmática. A partir da análise de normas, textos doutrinários, legislação e da investigação de alguns julgados, concluiu-se que nem o critério dicotômico nem o concorrencial são determinantes para a definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais, e sim o critério do modelo empresarial, bem como que a Lei nº 13.303/2016 não se aplica a todas as empresas estatais, independentemente da atividade por elas desempenhada.BrasilDIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITOPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUFMGORIGINALDissertação Versão Final - Debora C M Anjos.pdfapplication/pdf1527562https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/963c3c01-91da-42f5-8599-dfc0e6df2eb7/downloadb64d79c0082448a9ac3661d6275c5092MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txttext/plain2119https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/28776503-8f18-4e87-a4b8-12def9bb5939/download34badce4be7e31e3adb4575ae96af679MD52falseAnonymousREADTEXTDissertação Versão Final - Debora C M Anjos.pdf.txttext/plain431819https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/ef718d42-e53f-4fe9-a6b6-c54688c21214/download4203db687f42799d87463a93ec87238aMD53falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILDissertação Versão Final - Debora C M Anjos.pdf.jpgDissertação Versão Final - Debora C M Anjos.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2730https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/eb775dc8-3176-4512-978b-44a4cd1599eb/download1dfc400a5e2ff54bf68de4e634205668MD54falseAnonymousREAD1843/319872025-09-09 15:49:08.78open.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/31987https://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-09T18:49:08Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)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
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
title Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
spellingShingle Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
Débora Carvalho Mascarenhas dos Anjos
Direito administrativo
Empresas públicas
Sociedades de economia mista – Brasil
Licitação pública
Contrato público
Empresa estatal
Atividade econômica
Concorrência
Modelo empresarial
Regime jurídico de licitação e contratos
Lei nº 13.303/2016
title_short Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
title_full Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
title_fullStr Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
title_full_unstemmed Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
title_sort Definição do regime jurídico de licitação e contratos das empresas estatais: análise dos critérios dicotômico, concorrencial e modelo empresarial
author Débora Carvalho Mascarenhas dos Anjos
author_facet Débora Carvalho Mascarenhas dos Anjos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Débora Carvalho Mascarenhas dos Anjos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito administrativo
Empresas públicas
Sociedades de economia mista – Brasil
Licitação pública
Contrato público
topic Direito administrativo
Empresas públicas
Sociedades de economia mista – Brasil
Licitação pública
Contrato público
Empresa estatal
Atividade econômica
Concorrência
Modelo empresarial
Regime jurídico de licitação e contratos
Lei nº 13.303/2016
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv Empresa estatal
Atividade econômica
Concorrência
Modelo empresarial
Regime jurídico de licitação e contratos
Lei nº 13.303/2016
description This dissertation seeks to analyze, in light of the 1988 Republic’s Constitution, whether the dichotomous criterion is determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies and if Law number 13.303/2016, in the part that is relative to the topic, applies to all state-owned companies, regardless of the activity performed. The research’s hypothesis consisted on the affirmation that the competitive criterion is determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies. As a theoretical framework, the work utilizes the classification proposed by Eros Roberto Grau, according to whom economic activities are those that are destined to satisfy the necessities of collectivity by means of the utilization of goods and services. Thus, both the public services and the economic activities in a strict sense are species of the gender economic activity in a broad sense. In order to achieve the general objective proposed, the methodology belonging to the legal-dogmatic angle was adopted. Stemming from the analysis of norms, doctrinal texts, legislation, as well as from the investigation of certain judgements, it was concluded that neither the dichotomous criterion nor the competitive one are determinant for the definition of the legal regime of bidding and contracts of the state-owned companies, but rather the criterion of the business model. It was also concluded that the Law number 13.303/2016 does not apply to all state-owned companies, regardless of the activity performed by them.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-08-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-01-17T21:13:33Z
2025-09-08T23:12:37Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-01-17T21:13:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31987
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31987
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/963c3c01-91da-42f5-8599-dfc0e6df2eb7/download
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/28776503-8f18-4e87-a4b8-12def9bb5939/download
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/ef718d42-e53f-4fe9-a6b6-c54688c21214/download
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/eb775dc8-3176-4512-978b-44a4cd1599eb/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b64d79c0082448a9ac3661d6275c5092
34badce4be7e31e3adb4575ae96af679
4203db687f42799d87463a93ec87238a
1dfc400a5e2ff54bf68de4e634205668
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1862105616008347648