Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Otoniel Félix de
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
dARK ID: ark:/26339/0013000008q6j
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29251
Resumo: The present study evaluated commercial probiotics, composed of microorganisms from Bacillus, and their effects on the productive performance, egg quality, and serum biochemistry of layer breeders, as well as growth performance and fecal microbiota of broiler chickens. For this, two experiments were performed in the Poultry Science Laboratory at Federal University of Santa Maria. In experiment I, the objective was to evaluate the effects of using Bacillus subtilis PB6 (2.0 x 1011 CFU/g), chromium propionate, or a combination of both on performance, egg and eggshell quality, nutrient metabolizability, and serum biochemistry of layer breeders. Sixty-four hens of Rhodes Island Red (n = 32) and Plymouth Rock White (n = 32) at 55 weeks of age, housed in individual cages in a conventional laying house, were used. Birds were distributed in a randomized block design, with 4 treatments and 16 replicates, with birds used as the experimental unit. The diets were: control; control + probiotic (supplemented with B. subtilis, 500g/ton); control + CrProp (chromium propionate, 50g/ton); control + B. subtilis + CrProp (supplemented with both additives). Productive parameters and eggshell quality as well as biochemical parameters and serum cortisol, were grouped into periods of 28 days each and from 55 to 70 weeks. Nutrient and energy metabolizability were determined at 70 weeks of age. Data were submitted for analysis of variance using the SAS GLM procedure, and when significant, means were compared by the Tukey test (P<0.05). In the total period, hens fed the control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets had greater egg production, egg mass, shell percentage, shell thickness, and shell strength (P<0.05). The metabolizability of dry matter, nitrogen, and energy was higher in hens fed the control + probiotic + CrProp (P<0.05). In conclusion, the diet probiotic + CrProp supplementation for layer breeders from 55 to 70 weeks increased the digestibility of nutrients and improved the productive performance and egg quality. In experiment II, a probiotic B. subtilis BS-009, BS-020, and BS-024 (5 x 1011 spores/g) was evaluated, compared to an antibiotic growth promoter. A total of 750 male Cobb 500 1-day-old chicks were distributed to 5 treatments, with 6 replicates of 25 birds. The treatments were: Negative control (basal diet without additives or challenge); Challenged positive control (CP) and supplemented with 0.2 kg/ton of probiotic; CP + 0.3 kg/ton of probiotic; CP + 0.4 lg/ton of probiotic and CP + 0.025 kg of flavomycin/ton. At 14 days, broilers of challenged treatments received a commercial cocci vaccine (10x dose). On day 19, birds were orally gavaged with 1 mL/bird of Clostridium perfringens (3.1 x 109 cfu/mL). O day 5 and 25, excreta were collected for microbiome analysis. Growth performance was evaluated weekly until day 42. There was no significant difference in performance variables between treatments. However, there was an increase in the diversity of fecal microbiota for acidic bacteria and Clostidiales at 5 and 25 days. Therefore, probiotic supplementation contributed to maintain performance and for the beneficial composition of microbiota in broilers. In conclusion, probiotics from different B. subtilis strains contributed to improve performance and egg quality of laying hens as well as microbiome of broiler chickens.
id UFSM_39825c7e25426c8f011ae7a5fe4047b3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/29251
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeirasEvaluation of probiotics for broiler chickens and probiotics and organic chromium for laying hensBacillus subtilisDigestibilidadeFrango de corteMicrobiomaPropionato de cromoQualidade de ovosBroilerChromium propionateDigestibilityEgg qualityMicrobiome.CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAThe present study evaluated commercial probiotics, composed of microorganisms from Bacillus, and their effects on the productive performance, egg quality, and serum biochemistry of layer breeders, as well as growth performance and fecal microbiota of broiler chickens. For this, two experiments were performed in the Poultry Science Laboratory at Federal University of Santa Maria. In experiment I, the objective was to evaluate the effects of using Bacillus subtilis PB6 (2.0 x 1011 CFU/g), chromium propionate, or a combination of both on performance, egg and eggshell quality, nutrient metabolizability, and serum biochemistry of layer breeders. Sixty-four hens of Rhodes Island Red (n = 32) and Plymouth Rock White (n = 32) at 55 weeks of age, housed in individual cages in a conventional laying house, were used. Birds were distributed in a randomized block design, with 4 treatments and 16 replicates, with birds used as the experimental unit. The diets were: control; control + probiotic (supplemented with B. subtilis, 500g/ton); control + CrProp (chromium propionate, 50g/ton); control + B. subtilis + CrProp (supplemented with both additives). Productive parameters and eggshell quality as well as biochemical parameters and serum cortisol, were grouped into periods of 28 days each and from 55 to 70 weeks. Nutrient and energy metabolizability were determined at 70 weeks of age. Data were submitted for analysis of variance using the SAS GLM procedure, and when significant, means were compared by the Tukey test (P<0.05). In the total period, hens fed the control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets had greater egg production, egg mass, shell percentage, shell thickness, and shell strength (P<0.05). The metabolizability of dry matter, nitrogen, and energy was higher in hens fed the control + probiotic + CrProp (P<0.05). In conclusion, the diet probiotic + CrProp supplementation for layer breeders from 55 to 70 weeks increased the digestibility of nutrients and improved the productive performance and egg quality. In experiment II, a probiotic B. subtilis BS-009, BS-020, and BS-024 (5 x 1011 spores/g) was evaluated, compared to an antibiotic growth promoter. A total of 750 male Cobb 500 1-day-old chicks were distributed to 5 treatments, with 6 replicates of 25 birds. The treatments were: Negative control (basal diet without additives or challenge); Challenged positive control (CP) and supplemented with 0.2 kg/ton of probiotic; CP + 0.3 kg/ton of probiotic; CP + 0.4 lg/ton of probiotic and CP + 0.025 kg of flavomycin/ton. At 14 days, broilers of challenged treatments received a commercial cocci vaccine (10x dose). On day 19, birds were orally gavaged with 1 mL/bird of Clostridium perfringens (3.1 x 109 cfu/mL). O day 5 and 25, excreta were collected for microbiome analysis. Growth performance was evaluated weekly until day 42. There was no significant difference in performance variables between treatments. However, there was an increase in the diversity of fecal microbiota for acidic bacteria and Clostidiales at 5 and 25 days. Therefore, probiotic supplementation contributed to maintain performance and for the beneficial composition of microbiota in broilers. In conclusion, probiotics from different B. subtilis strains contributed to improve performance and egg quality of laying hens as well as microbiome of broiler chickens.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESO presente estudo avaliou a utilização de probióticos comerciais, compostos por microrganismos do gênero Bacillus, e seus efeitos sobre o desempenho produtivo, qualidade de ovos e bioquímica sérica de matrizes de poedeiras, além do desempenho e microbiota fecal de frangos de corte. Para isso, foram realizados dois experimentos nas instalações do Laboratório de Avicultura da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. No experimento I, o objetivo foi avaliar os efeitos da utilização de Bacillus subtilis PB6 (2.0 × 1011 UFC/g), propionato de cromo ou uma combinação dos dois aditivos sobre o desempenho, qualidade dos ovos e da casca do ovo, metabolizabilidade de nutrientes e bioquímica sérica de matrizes de poedeiras. Foram utilizadas 64 matrizes de poedeiras das raças Rhodes Island Red (n = 32) e Plymouth Rock White (n = 32) com 55 semanas de idade, alojadas em gaiolas individuais em galpão convencional de postura. As aves foram distribuídas em delineamento de blocos ao acaso, com 4 tratamentos e 16 repetições, com as aves utilizadas como unidade experimental. As dietas foram: controle; controle + probiótico (suplementada com B. subtilis, 500g/t); controle + CrProp (propionato de cromo, 50g/t); controle + B. subtilis + CrProp. Parâmetros produtivos e qualidade da casca do ovo, bem como parâmetros bioquímicos e cortisol no soro foram agrupados em períodos de 28 dias cada, e no período total de 55 a 70 semanas. A metabolizabilidade de nutrientes e energia foi determinada às 70 semanas de idade. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância pelo procedimento GLM do SAS, e quando significativas, as médias foram comparadas pelo teste Tukey (P<0,05). No período total, as galinhas alimentadas com as dietas controle + probiótico ou controle + probiótico + CrProp tiveram maior produção de ovos, massa de ovos, porcentagem de casca, espessura e resistência da casca (P<0,05). A metabolizabilidade da matéria seca, nitrogênio e energia foi maior quando as galinhas que receberam a dieta controle + probiótico + CrProp (P<0,05). Portanto, a suplementação de probiótico + CrProp em rações para matrizes de poedeiras de 55 a 70 semanas resultou em melhor utilização de nutrientes e melhor desempenho produtivo e qualidade de ovos. No experimento II, foi avaliado o probiótico B. subtilis BS-009, BS-020 e BS-024 (5 × 1011 esporos/g), comparado a um antibiótico promotor de crescimento. Foram utilizados 750 pintos, machos, Cobb 500 com 1 dia de idade, distribuídos em 5 tratamentos, com 6 repetições de 25 aves. Os tratamentos foram: Controle negativo (dieta sem aditivo e sem desafio); Controle positivo desafiado (CP) e com suplementação de 0,2 kg/t de probiótico; CP + 0,3 kg/t de probiótico; CP + 0,4 kg/t de probiótico e CP + 0,025 kg de flavomicina/t. Aos 14 dias, os frangos dos tratamentos desafiados receberam vacina comercial para coccidiose (10× a dose). No 19° dia, foi realizada gavagem oral de 1 mL/ave com inóculo de Clostridium perfringens (3,1 × 109 UFC/mL). Nos dias 5 e 25 foram coletadas excretas para análise de microbioma. O desempenho produtivo foi avaliado semanalmente até os 42 dias. Não houve diferença significativa para as variáveis de desempenho entre os tratamentos. Entretanto, houve aumento na diversidade da microbiota fecal de bactérias ácidoláticas e do gênero Clostidiales, aos 5 e 25 dias. Dessa forma, a suplementação do probiótico contribuiu na manutenção do desempenho e composição da microbiota benéfica em frangos. Portanto, probióticos de diferentes cepas de B. subtilis contribuíram para a melhoria do desempenho e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras e do microbioma de frangos de corte.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilZootecniaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaCentro de Ciências RuraisStefanello, Catarinahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1004217874825544Ribeiro, Andrea Machado LealRosa, Daniele Pozzebon daCavalcante, Danilo TeixeiraSantos, Helton Fernandes dosSouza, Otoniel Félix de2023-05-30T18:44:50Z2023-05-30T18:44:50Z2023-04-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29251ark:/26339/0013000008q6jporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2023-05-30T18:44:50Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/29251Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.bropendoar:2023-05-30T18:44:50Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
Evaluation of probiotics for broiler chickens and probiotics and organic chromium for laying hens
title Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
spellingShingle Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
Souza, Otoniel Félix de
Bacillus subtilis
Digestibilidade
Frango de corte
Microbioma
Propionato de cromo
Qualidade de ovos
Broiler
Chromium propionate
Digestibility
Egg quality
Microbiome.
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
title_full Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
title_fullStr Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
title_sort Avaliação de probiótico para frangos de corte e probiótico e cromo orgânico para poedeiras
author Souza, Otoniel Félix de
author_facet Souza, Otoniel Félix de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Stefanello, Catarina
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1004217874825544
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
Rosa, Daniele Pozzebon da
Cavalcante, Danilo Teixeira
Santos, Helton Fernandes dos
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Otoniel Félix de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bacillus subtilis
Digestibilidade
Frango de corte
Microbioma
Propionato de cromo
Qualidade de ovos
Broiler
Chromium propionate
Digestibility
Egg quality
Microbiome.
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
topic Bacillus subtilis
Digestibilidade
Frango de corte
Microbioma
Propionato de cromo
Qualidade de ovos
Broiler
Chromium propionate
Digestibility
Egg quality
Microbiome.
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description The present study evaluated commercial probiotics, composed of microorganisms from Bacillus, and their effects on the productive performance, egg quality, and serum biochemistry of layer breeders, as well as growth performance and fecal microbiota of broiler chickens. For this, two experiments were performed in the Poultry Science Laboratory at Federal University of Santa Maria. In experiment I, the objective was to evaluate the effects of using Bacillus subtilis PB6 (2.0 x 1011 CFU/g), chromium propionate, or a combination of both on performance, egg and eggshell quality, nutrient metabolizability, and serum biochemistry of layer breeders. Sixty-four hens of Rhodes Island Red (n = 32) and Plymouth Rock White (n = 32) at 55 weeks of age, housed in individual cages in a conventional laying house, were used. Birds were distributed in a randomized block design, with 4 treatments and 16 replicates, with birds used as the experimental unit. The diets were: control; control + probiotic (supplemented with B. subtilis, 500g/ton); control + CrProp (chromium propionate, 50g/ton); control + B. subtilis + CrProp (supplemented with both additives). Productive parameters and eggshell quality as well as biochemical parameters and serum cortisol, were grouped into periods of 28 days each and from 55 to 70 weeks. Nutrient and energy metabolizability were determined at 70 weeks of age. Data were submitted for analysis of variance using the SAS GLM procedure, and when significant, means were compared by the Tukey test (P<0.05). In the total period, hens fed the control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets had greater egg production, egg mass, shell percentage, shell thickness, and shell strength (P<0.05). The metabolizability of dry matter, nitrogen, and energy was higher in hens fed the control + probiotic + CrProp (P<0.05). In conclusion, the diet probiotic + CrProp supplementation for layer breeders from 55 to 70 weeks increased the digestibility of nutrients and improved the productive performance and egg quality. In experiment II, a probiotic B. subtilis BS-009, BS-020, and BS-024 (5 x 1011 spores/g) was evaluated, compared to an antibiotic growth promoter. A total of 750 male Cobb 500 1-day-old chicks were distributed to 5 treatments, with 6 replicates of 25 birds. The treatments were: Negative control (basal diet without additives or challenge); Challenged positive control (CP) and supplemented with 0.2 kg/ton of probiotic; CP + 0.3 kg/ton of probiotic; CP + 0.4 lg/ton of probiotic and CP + 0.025 kg of flavomycin/ton. At 14 days, broilers of challenged treatments received a commercial cocci vaccine (10x dose). On day 19, birds were orally gavaged with 1 mL/bird of Clostridium perfringens (3.1 x 109 cfu/mL). O day 5 and 25, excreta were collected for microbiome analysis. Growth performance was evaluated weekly until day 42. There was no significant difference in performance variables between treatments. However, there was an increase in the diversity of fecal microbiota for acidic bacteria and Clostidiales at 5 and 25 days. Therefore, probiotic supplementation contributed to maintain performance and for the beneficial composition of microbiota in broilers. In conclusion, probiotics from different B. subtilis strains contributed to improve performance and egg quality of laying hens as well as microbiome of broiler chickens.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-30T18:44:50Z
2023-05-30T18:44:50Z
2023-04-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29251
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000008q6j
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29251
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000008q6j
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.br
_version_ 1847153368799117312