Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms
| Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Tese |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2135/tde-22032021-151649/ |
Resumo: | Local content requirements (LCRs) are traditionally described as industrial policy measures requiring the use of a certain amount or value of national parts or components in the manufacturing of finished goods. Conventional wisdom holds that they are clearly prohibited by international trade and investment disciplines, as evidenced by consistent case law. Yet, LCRs continue to be pervasively used by many countries. The thesis challenges conventional wisdom by looking into the referred rules and how they impact controversial policy areas, especially subsidies to \"localise\" manufacturing activities, of the types that were challenged in two WTO disputes that are studies in detail: the United States - Tax Incentives and Brazil - Taxation cases. The thesis confirms a threefold proposition: (i) many LCRs are lawful under international law, notably in the area of services and government procurement; (ii) various prohibited LCRs are tolerated in certain areas, such as mineral resource concessions and official credit facilities; and (iii) case law on LCRs is only partially consistent, as far as the national treatment obligation is concerned. By contrast, the disciplines on \"local content\" subsidies and \"localisation\" incentives, as recently interpreted in the two cases studied, are rather unclear and perplexing. In order to improve the security and predictability of the policy space available for such measures, the thesis suggests a reform or a reinterpretation of the rules. |
| id |
USP_bd6db2e0abb3e70801642855db4938f0 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-22032021-151649 |
| network_acronym_str |
USP |
| network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international normsRequisitos de conteúdo local : perspectiva comparada à luz das regras da OMC e outras normas internacionaisComércio internacionalConteúdo localDireito internacionalInternational economic lawLocal content requirementsPolítica industrialSubsidiesWorld Trade OrganizationLocal content requirements (LCRs) are traditionally described as industrial policy measures requiring the use of a certain amount or value of national parts or components in the manufacturing of finished goods. Conventional wisdom holds that they are clearly prohibited by international trade and investment disciplines, as evidenced by consistent case law. Yet, LCRs continue to be pervasively used by many countries. The thesis challenges conventional wisdom by looking into the referred rules and how they impact controversial policy areas, especially subsidies to \"localise\" manufacturing activities, of the types that were challenged in two WTO disputes that are studies in detail: the United States - Tax Incentives and Brazil - Taxation cases. The thesis confirms a threefold proposition: (i) many LCRs are lawful under international law, notably in the area of services and government procurement; (ii) various prohibited LCRs are tolerated in certain areas, such as mineral resource concessions and official credit facilities; and (iii) case law on LCRs is only partially consistent, as far as the national treatment obligation is concerned. By contrast, the disciplines on \"local content\" subsidies and \"localisation\" incentives, as recently interpreted in the two cases studied, are rather unclear and perplexing. In order to improve the security and predictability of the policy space available for such measures, the thesis suggests a reform or a reinterpretation of the rules.Requisitos de conteúdo local (RCLs) são usualmente descritos como medidas de política industrial que exigem o uso de uma certa quantidade ou valor de peças ou componentes nacionais na fabricação de produtos acabados. Conforme o senso comum, tais RCLs são claramente proibidos pelas disciplinas de investimento e comércio internacional, conforme evidenciado por jurisprudência consistente. No entanto, os RCLs continuam a ser amplamente usados por muitos países. A tese desafia o senso comum por meio do exame das referidas regras e de como elas impactam áreas controversas de política pública, especialmente subsídios para a \"localização\" de atividades produtivas, dos tipos que foram questionados em duas disputas da OMC que são estudadas em detalhade: os casos US - Tax Incentives e Brasil - Taxation. Confirma-se a seguinte hipótese: (i) muitos RCLs estão em conformidade com o direito internacional, principalmente na área de serviços e compras governamentais; (ii) vários RCLs proibidos são tolerados em certas áreas, tais como concessões para a exploração de recursos minerais e linhas de crédito oficiais; e (iii) a jurisprudência sobre RCLs é apenas parcialmente consistente, no que diz respeito à obrigação de tratamento nacional. Porém, as disciplinas sobre subsídios de \"conteúdo local\" e incentivos à \"localização\", como interpretadas recentemente nos dois casos estudados, são pouco claras e causam perplexidade. A fim de aprimorar a segurança e a previsibilidade do policy space disponível para tais medidas, a tese propõe uma reforma ou reinterpretação das regras.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPCelli Júnior, UmbertoSpadano, Lucas Eduardo Freitas do Amaral2020-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2135/tde-22032021-151649/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPReter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2025-02-04T18:25:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-22032021-151649Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212025-02-04T18:25:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms Requisitos de conteúdo local : perspectiva comparada à luz das regras da OMC e outras normas internacionais |
| title |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms |
| spellingShingle |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms Spadano, Lucas Eduardo Freitas do Amaral Comércio internacional Conteúdo local Direito internacional International economic law Local content requirements Política industrial Subsidies World Trade Organization |
| title_short |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms |
| title_full |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms |
| title_fullStr |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms |
| title_sort |
Local content requirements : perspectives under WTO law and other international norms |
| author |
Spadano, Lucas Eduardo Freitas do Amaral |
| author_facet |
Spadano, Lucas Eduardo Freitas do Amaral |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Celli Júnior, Umberto |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Spadano, Lucas Eduardo Freitas do Amaral |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comércio internacional Conteúdo local Direito internacional International economic law Local content requirements Política industrial Subsidies World Trade Organization |
| topic |
Comércio internacional Conteúdo local Direito internacional International economic law Local content requirements Política industrial Subsidies World Trade Organization |
| description |
Local content requirements (LCRs) are traditionally described as industrial policy measures requiring the use of a certain amount or value of national parts or components in the manufacturing of finished goods. Conventional wisdom holds that they are clearly prohibited by international trade and investment disciplines, as evidenced by consistent case law. Yet, LCRs continue to be pervasively used by many countries. The thesis challenges conventional wisdom by looking into the referred rules and how they impact controversial policy areas, especially subsidies to \"localise\" manufacturing activities, of the types that were challenged in two WTO disputes that are studies in detail: the United States - Tax Incentives and Brazil - Taxation cases. The thesis confirms a threefold proposition: (i) many LCRs are lawful under international law, notably in the area of services and government procurement; (ii) various prohibited LCRs are tolerated in certain areas, such as mineral resource concessions and official credit facilities; and (iii) case law on LCRs is only partially consistent, as far as the national treatment obligation is concerned. By contrast, the disciplines on \"local content\" subsidies and \"localisation\" incentives, as recently interpreted in the two cases studied, are rather unclear and perplexing. In order to improve the security and predictability of the policy space available for such measures, the thesis suggests a reform or a reinterpretation of the rules. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-27 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| format |
doctoralThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2135/tde-22032021-151649/ |
| url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2135/tde-22032021-151649/ |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais. |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
| instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| instacron_str |
USP |
| institution |
USP |
| reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
| _version_ |
1839839154667520000 |